Ikigai LawIkigai LawIkigai LawIkigai Law
  • About Us
    • About
    • Our Team
    • FinTales
    • Tech Ticker
  • Practice Areas
  • Blog
  • News & Events
    • Ikigai Law in the news
    • Ikigai Law at events
    • Ikigailaw on the social media
  • Careers

TRAI consultation papers analysis: Introduction

    Home Digital Economy TRAI consultation papers analysis: Introduction
    NextPrevious

    TRAI consultation papers analysis: Introduction

    By Ikigai Law | Digital Economy | 0 comment | 24 January, 2020 | 8
    1. Preliminary

    The Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (“TRAI”) is a statutory body that acts as the regulator of the telecommunications sector in India. It was set up by the government of India under section 3 of the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India Act, 1997 (“TRAI Act”). The TRAI concerns itself with regulating telecom tariffs, quality of telecom services, spectrum licensing, internet and broadband services, and TV and radio broadcasting, amongst many other telecom products and services in India. One of the  prime objectives of the TRAI is to “provide a fair and transparent policy environment which promotes a level playing field and facilitates fair competition.” In line with this objective, the TRAI often issues regulations, orders and directives to deal with issues that concern the Indian telecommunications sector. The TRAI also conducts public stakeholder consultations by publishing consultation papers and crowdsourcing comments and counter comments on the papers.  It uses these stakeholder comments to shape its final recommendations on national telecom issues. These recommendations are issued either suo motu or on the central government’s request. The TRAI Act requires the central government to seek the TRAI’s recommendations if a new license is to be issued to a service provider, insofar as the need and timing of a new service provider and the terms and conditions of the license to be granted are concerned. However, these recommendations are not binding on the central government.

    Public stakeholder consultations allow non-governmental bodies like academic institutions, policy organisations, private companies and civil society organisations to be a part of the government’s decision-making process. This makes the decision-making process comprehensive, transparent and all inclusive. Given the importance of these consultations, Vihang Jumle, associate at Ikigai Law, undertook a project to study instances where stakeholders were able to significantly influence TRAI’s views on an issue relating to internet services through the public consultation process.  This blog post details the scope of this project and the methodology used to study the TRAI’s consultation papers. It also provides an outline of the upcoming blogs.

    2. Scope

    The project focuses on consultations carried out by the TRAI for the period between 26 September 2014 to 26 September 2019 to align it with the tenure of the National Democratic Alliance – I government. Within this period, the TRAI released a total of 110 consultation papers (this figure includes both closed[1] and on-going[2] consultations). Of these 110 consultation papers, 13 consultation papers touched upon issues relevant to internet services, i.e., – (i) cloud computing, (ii) over-the-top services, (iii) net neutrality and (iv) data governance. These papers are:

    A. On cloud computing:

    i. Consulting note on model for nation-wide interoperable and scalable public wi-fi networks.

    ii. Consulting paper on proliferation of broadband through public wi-fi networks.

    iii. Consulting paper on cloud computing.

    iv. Consulting paper on promoting local telecom equipment manufacturing.

    B. On over-the-top services:

    i. Consulting paper on internet telephony.

    ii. Consulting paper on regulatory framework for over-the-top communication services.

    C. On net-neutrality:

    i. Consultation paper on implementation model for BharatNet.

    ii. Consulting paper on net neutrality.

    iii. Pre-consultation on net neutrality.

    D. On data governance:

    i. Consulting paper on free data.

    ii. Consulting paper on privacy, security and ownership of data in the telecom sector.

    iii. Consulting paper on differential pricing for data services.

    E. The consultation paper on inputs for the formation of draft national telecom policy 2018 can be classified under all categories.

    3. Methodology

    TRAI has issued recommendations for 8 out of the 13 consultation papers (collectively referred to as “Closed consultation papers”) listed above. These consultation papers are:

    A. Consulting paper on privacy, security and ownership of data in the telecom sector.

    B. Consulting paper on internet telephony.

    C. Consulting paper on proliferation of broadband through public wi-fi networks.

    D. Consulting paper on promoting local telecom equipment manufacturing.

    E. Consultation on inputs for formation of draft national telecom policy 2018.

    F. Consultation paper on implementation model for BharatNet.

    G. Consulting paper on cloud computing.

    H. Consulting paper on net neutrality.

    These 8 Closed consultation papers were qualitatively compared to identify instances where the recommendations issued by the TRAI differed from its original stance in its consultation papers. For example, instances where a consultation paper has stated that “the world is round” versus where the corresponding recommendation paper has stated that “the world is flat” were identified. Stakeholder comments to Closed consultation papers were thoroughly studied. Only those stakeholders who advocated ideas similar to those presented by the TRAI in its recommendation papers were identified as ‘relevant stakeholders’ for the study. Business interests of such stakeholders were studied to understand why they may have advocated for a certain policy change through their comments. We also attempted to understand why the TRAI may have changed its stance on a certain issue in its recommendations.  

    Out of the 8 Closed consultation papers, it was observed that only 1 consultation paper presented suggestions that differed from those presented in the corresponding recommendation paper. This paper is the ‘Consultation on inputs for formation of draft National Telecom Policy 2018’.

    TRAI presented similar ideas in the consultation paper and its corresponding recommendation paper in the remaining 7 closed consultation papers.

    4. What’s next?

    The upcoming blog post (second in this series) will present a description of the 7 consultation papers’ key themes. The blog post will describe how the TRAI presented same ideas within these 7 closed consultation papers. The next blog post (third in this series) will present an analysis of the ‘consultation paper on the input for the formulation of the draft national telecom policy 2018’. TRAI presented numerous conflicting ideas in this consultation paper and its recommendation and the blog post will describe which stakeholders may have influenced the TRAI on changing its stance and why they may have done so.

    (Authored by Vihang Jumle, Associate, with inputs from Tuhina Joshi, Policy Associate at Ikigai Law.)


    [1] Closed consultations refer to those consultation papers whose corresponding recommendation papers have been published by the TRAI.

    [2] On-going consultations refer to those consultation papers whose corresponding recommendation papers are yet to be released by the TRAI.

    Consultation, governance, India, Law, policy, Regulator, Telecommunications, TRAI, Transparency

    Ikigai Law

    More posts by Ikigai Law

    Related Post

    • ‘Over-The-Top’ And ‘Telecom’ Services – Similar Or Not? Stakeholders’ Responses To TRAI Consultation Paper

      By Ikigai Law | 0 comment

      Preliminary   On 12 November 2018, the Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (“TRAI”)[1] published the Consultation Paper on Regulatory Framework for over-the-top (“OTT”) communication services (“Consultation Paper”).[2] This Consultation Paper was deemed necessary due toRead more

    • Stakeholders’ responses to the TRAI privacy consultation paper (Part XI of XII): Parity in the data protection norms between TSPs and other communication service providers

      By Ikigai Law | 0 comment

      This is the eleventh post, in a twelve (12) part series of posts, to map the opinions of all the stakeholders on the basis of their responses to the consultation paper on Privacy, Security, andRead more

    • Stakeholders’ responses to the TRAI privacy consultation paper (Part X of XII): Safety and security of telecommunications infrastructure and digital ecosystem

      By Ikigai Law | 0 comment

      This is the tenth post, in a twelve (12) part series of posts, to map the opinions of all the stakeholders on the basis of their responses to the consultation paper on Privacy, Security, andRead more

    • Crypto Update: Law/policy developments in India

      By Ikigai Law | 0 comment

      Anish Krishnan, interning with us at TRA for January – February 2018 and Nehaa Chaudhari, Lead – Policy  have put together a timeline on key developments on #cryptocurrency law and policy in India. February 10th: SebiRead more

    • Internet Exchanges in India: A Legal Anomaly

      By Ikigai Law | 0 comment

      This post provides an introduction to Internet Exchanges in India and examines the regulatory issues plaguing the sector. We also look at a recent regulatory dispute currently in the Delhi High Court and discuss itsRead more

    Leave a Comment

    Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    NextPrevious

    Tags

    #DataProtection #Fintales bitcoin Blockchain Budget Consent Consultation Consultation Paper cryptocurrency data Data Controllers data governance Data localisation Data Protection Data Subjects digital economy Digital India Drones E-Commerce Facebook Fintech Government Government of India healthtech Ikigai Law India Indian government Innovation MeITY Notice Payments Personal Data policy Privacy RBI Recommendation Regulation Srikrishna Committee Stakeholders Startups Surveillance Technology Tech Policy TechTicker TRAI

    Connect with Ikigai Law

    Copyright 2018 Ikigai Law | All Rights Reserved             

    Information

    • Practice Areas
    • Blog
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy

    Contact us

    Office
    T-7/402, Commonwealth Games Village Apartment,
    New Delhi, Delhi 110092 India.

    Email Address

    contact@ikigailaw.com

    • About Us
      • About
      • Our Team
      • FinTales
      • Tech Ticker
    • Practice Areas
    • Blog
    • News & Events
      • Ikigai Law in the news
      • Ikigai Law at events
      • Ikigailaw on the social media
    • Careers
    Ikigai Law