Ikigai LawIkigai LawIkigai LawIkigai Law
  • About Us
    • About
    • Our Team
    • FinTales
    • Tech Ticker
  • Practice Areas
  • Blog
  • News & Events
    • Ikigai Law in the news
    • Ikigai Law at events
    • Ikigailaw on the social media
  • Careers

Stakeholders’ responses to the White Paper on a data protection framework in India

    Home Data Governance Stakeholders’ responses to the White Paper on a data protection framework in India
    NextPrevious

    Stakeholders’ responses to the White Paper on a data protection framework in India

    By Ikigai Law | Data Governance | 0 comment | 16 August, 2018 | 7

    In a 4 part series, we have mapped the publicly accessible opinions of 27 stakeholders on the White Paper of the Committee of Experts on a Data Protection Framework for India, released on 27th November, 2017 (“White Paper”). Comments of all 27 stakeholders are available here.

    In each of our posts, a table provides a brief snapshot of where different stakeholders stand on the issue being addressed in the post. Posts are based entirely on our understanding of stakeholders’ responses that have been compiled by the Future of Finance Initiative of Dvara Research. We have not reached out to anyone for clarifications/comments on their comments on the White Paper. We hope that this provides some insight into what some stakeholders in the country are thinking. The following 4 posts are accessible on our blog:

    1. Part 1 – Cross Border Data Flows: Addresses the question of jurisdictional challenges and measures needed to address issues arising from cross border data flows.
    2. Part 2 – Data Localization: Addresses the issues arising from data localization including implementation of data localization and economic impact of such a mandate.
    3. Part 3 – Scope of Law: Addresses issues related to the scope of the proposed data protection law including inclusion of natural/juristic persons and private/public sector, and extra-territorial and retrospective application, in the proposed law.
    4. Part 4 – Grounds of Processing: Addresses the question of permissible grounds of processing including the primacy of consent for processing personal data and reliance on notice and choice mechanism for operationalizing consent.

     [This post is authored by Pushan Dwivedi, Associate, Ikigai.]

    #DataProtection, #DataTransfer, #InformedConsent, #LegitimateInterest, #MeaningfulConsent, #WhitePaper, Choice, Consent, Ikigai Law, Innovation, MeITY, Notice, Processing, Protection, Security, SrikrishnaCommittee, Stakeholders, TRALaw, Vital Interest

    Ikigai Law

    More posts by Ikigai Law

    Related Post

    • TRAI recommendations on privacy, security and ownership of data in the telecom sector: Mapping of stakeholders’ opinions

      By Ikigai Law | 0 comment

      This note maps the position of all the stakeholders in relation to the Recommendations on Privacy, Security, and Ownership of the Data in the Telecom Sector (“Recommendations”) published by the Telecom Regulatory Authority of IndiaRead more

    • Stakeholders’ responses to the TRAI privacy consultation paper

      By Ikigai Law | 0 comment

      In a 12 part series, we have mapped stakeholders’ comments to the Consultation Paper on Privacy, Security and Ownership of the Data in the Telecom Sector by Telecom Regulatory Authority of India (TRAI). In order toRead more

    • Mapping comments to the Srikrishna Committee on data protection (Part IV): Grounds of processing

      By Ikigai Law | 0 comment

      This note maps the opinions of some stakeholders to the White Paper of the Committee of Experts on a Data Protection Framework for India, released on 27th November, 2017 (“White Paper”). While all responses toRead more

    • Comments of certain start-ups on the Personal Data Protection Bill, 2018: Consolidated views

      By Ikigai Law | 0 comment

      Context: In response to the Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology’s (“MeITY”) call for comments on the Personal Data Protection Bill, 2018 (“Bill”), Ikigai Law and Inc42 submitted a consolidated set of comments reflecting theRead more

    • Clause-wise mapping of the JPC’s recommendations on India’ data protection law

      By Ikigai Law | 0 comment

      A detailed clause-wise analysis of the Parliamentary committee’s report on India’s data protection law. On 16 December 2021, the Joint Parliamentary Committee on the Personal Data Protection Bill, 2019 tabled its report in Parliament. TheRead more

    Leave a Comment

    Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    NextPrevious

    Tags

    #DataProtection #Fintales bitcoin Blockchain Budget Consent Consultation Consultation Paper cryptocurrency data Data Controllers data governance Data localisation Data Protection Data Subjects digital economy Digital India Drones E-Commerce Facebook Fintech Government Government of India healthtech Ikigai Law India Indian government Innovation MeITY Notice Payments Personal Data policy Privacy RBI Recommendation Regulation Srikrishna Committee Stakeholders Startups Surveillance Technology Tech Policy TechTicker TRAI

    Connect with Ikigai Law

    Copyright 2018 Ikigai Law | All Rights Reserved             

    Information

    • Practice Areas
    • Blog
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy

    Contact us

    Office
    T-7/402, Commonwealth Games Village Apartment,
    New Delhi, Delhi 110092 India.

    Email Address

    contact@ikigailaw.com

    • About Us
      • About
      • Our Team
      • FinTales
      • Tech Ticker
    • Practice Areas
    • Blog
    • News & Events
      • Ikigai Law in the news
      • Ikigai Law at events
      • Ikigailaw on the social media
    • Careers
    Ikigai Law