Ikigai LawIkigai LawIkigai LawIkigai Law
  • About Us
    • About
    • Our Team
    • FinTales
    • Tech Ticker
  • Practice Areas
  • Blog
  • News & Events
    • Ikigai Law in the news
    • Ikigai Law at events
    • Ikigailaw on the social media
  • Careers

Our notes: ‘Hate Speech or the speech we hate’ – A lecture by Mr. Salil Tripathi

    Home Online Content Our notes: ‘Hate Speech or the speech we hate’ – A lecture by Mr. Salil Tripathi
    NextPrevious

    Our notes: ‘Hate Speech or the speech we hate’ – A lecture by Mr. Salil Tripathi

    By Ikigai Law | Online Content | 0 comment | 6 September, 2019 | 3

     1. Preliminary

     1.1 On 2 September 2019, the Centre for Policy Research organized a lecture on hate speech, with renowned journalist Mr. Salil Tripathi as the guest lecturer. In addition to his work as contributing editor for the Mint and Caravan, Mr. Tripathi has won many awards for his contributions in the fields of human rights. The lecture was attended by Tuhina Joshi, Associate and Rishwin Chandra Jethi, Associate at Ikigai Law. This blogpost provides our notes from the event.

     2. Key points from the lecture

     2.1 Hate-speech is a misunderstood term. People from countries like India, Philippines and Turkey use it  as a catch-all phrase to disagree with what is being said.

    2.2 In most States, laws put a restriction on the freedom of speech. There is a legitimate scope for restriction on speech. This does not mean that whatever one disagrees with needs to be censored.

    2.3 In India, sections 153A and 295 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 deal with speech which insults religious sentiments and promotes enmity between different groups.

    2.4 These are colonial laws which can be used to prohibit the everyday acts of liking pages on social media, cartoons and other content on websites like Facebook if they are hurtful for certain groups.

    2.5 A landmark example of the application of these laws is the case of Ramesh Prabhu Prabhakar Gupte where the courts reduced Bal Thackeray’s civil rights and banned him from voting and contesting elections for a while. This in turn made him more popular among the masses.

    2.6 This is one of the reasons why hate speech should not be banned. Doing so makes it more popular, sensational and more likely to be shared and viewed. Censoring hate speech will only add decibels to it and may provide martyrdom to its proponents by those who follow them.

    2.7 Susan Benesch calls for the need to create a distinction between hate speech and dangerous speech. Hate speech is critical of a particular faith, idea, religion, caste and race, among other identifiers. Dangerous speech takes it a notch higher, by inciting and promoting violence based on the generalization of hate speech. There is an element of clear and imminent violence against a particular community in dangerous speech. Unless there is a direct provocation of violence or imminent fear, it is hateful speech.

    2.8 There are the 6 ingredients of dangerous speech:

            2.8.1 The speaker is an influential orator who is popular amongst the people he is addressing;

            2.8.2 The audience is susceptible to being swayed easily;

            2.8.3 The speech provokes violence against a particular community and instills fear;

            2.8.4 The speech is based on a grievance or a sense of loss (typically of pride or rights) that the audience can relate to;

            2.8.5 The speech touches upon the concept of purity (typically ethnic or racial) and the idea of outsiders disturbing the balance of society; and

            2.8.6 The speech uses coded language to communicate an idea or dehumanize the ‘other’ community.

    2.9 Banning dangerous speech is not the solution to countering it, since that only increases its popularity. Instead, dangerous speech can be delegitimized by countering it with facts, civility and other tactics to defuse tension.

    2.10 An example of counter-speech is the Iranian government’s response to a series of Danish cartoons which were critical of Islam. Most other Islamic governments responded in a disproportionate manner and put trade restrictions on Denmark, promoted violence and assault against the cartoonists, and threatened their lives. The government of Iran on the other hand launched their own series of cartoons in return against Christians and Jews.

    2.11 As for the law, while it should be used against people who use dangerous speech and bring it to the national discourse, the fact is that those who actually employ dangerous speech with terrible consequences (i.e., parliamentarians, ministers and other political representatives) go scot-free. This shows that it is actually the underlying power dynamics between different groups of people that allows dangerous speech to propagate. That being said, the Supreme Court of India must have a re-look at Article 19 of the Constitution of India and acknowledge the difference between hate speech and ‘dangerous speech’.

     

     

    This post is authored by Rishwin Chandra Jethi, Associate with inputs from Tuhina Joshi, Associate at Ikigai Law.

    censorship, dangerous speech, free speech, freedom of speech, fundamental rights, hate speech

    Ikigai Law

    More posts by Ikigai Law

    Related Post

    • Online content regulation: how is it done in other parts of the world?

      By Ikigai Law | 0 comment

      The media & entertainment industry has witnessed a steady growth across the world. The recent trend of the use of the internet for media consumption has catalyzed this growth.[1] Today, many online media platforms orRead more

    • Human Rights Due Diligences and Impact Assessment for Tech Companies

      By Ikigai Law | 0 comment

      The third article in our series on technology businesses and human rights explains human rights due diligences and impact assessments. Other articles can be read here and here. As technology leaves its indelible marks onRead more

    • An Overview of Internet Shutdowns in Africa

      By Ikigai Law | 0 comment

      An internet shutdown is defined as “an intentional disruption of internet or electronic communications, rendering them inaccessible or effectively unusable, for a specific population or within a location, often to exert control over the flowRead more

    • Legislating on Hate Speech and Disinformation – Lessons from Ethiopia

      By Ikigai Law | 0 comment

      Context Democracies across the world are grappling with the twin problems of hate speech and disinformation. The internet, as a common platform for communication, has been weaponised to spread a concoction of untruths, abuse andRead more

    • Internet takedowns: A global perspective

      By Ikigai Law | 0 comment

      Introduction Various governments across the world have sought to regulate online content. The need for regulating online content has arisen due to a number of factors. These include posting content which depicts live terror attacksRead more

    Leave a Comment

    Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    NextPrevious

    Tags

    #DataProtection #Fintales bitcoin Blockchain Budget Consent Consultation Consultation Paper cryptocurrency data Data Controllers data governance Data localisation Data Protection Data Subjects digital economy Digital India Drones E-Commerce Facebook Fintech Government Government of India healthtech Ikigai Law India Indian government Innovation MeITY Notice Payments Personal Data policy Privacy RBI Recommendation Regulation Srikrishna Committee Stakeholders Startups Surveillance Technology Tech Policy TechTicker TRAI

    Connect with Ikigai Law

    Copyright 2018 Ikigai Law | All Rights Reserved             

    Information

    • Practice Areas
    • Blog
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy

    Contact us

    Office
    T-7/402, Commonwealth Games Village Apartment,
    New Delhi, Delhi 110092 India.

    Email Address

    contact@ikigailaw.com

    • About Us
      • About
      • Our Team
      • FinTales
      • Tech Ticker
    • Practice Areas
    • Blog
    • News & Events
      • Ikigai Law in the news
      • Ikigai Law at events
      • Ikigailaw on the social media
    • Careers
    Ikigai Law