Ikigai LawIkigai LawIkigai LawIkigai Law
  • About Us
    • About
    • Our Team
    • FinTales
    • Tech Ticker
  • Practice Areas
  • Blog
  • News & Events
    • Ikigai Law in the news
    • Ikigai Law at events
    • Ikigailaw on the social media
  • Careers

Confidentiality Agreements: How to Protect Your Client Pitches

    Home Startups Confidentiality Agreements: How to Protect Your Client Pitches
    NextPrevious

    Confidentiality Agreements: How to Protect Your Client Pitches

    By Ikigai Law | Startups | 0 comment | 7 November, 2019 | 6

    Vivo’s recent ad campaigns feature Aamir Khan and a child in an amusement park and shows off the impressive Vivo pop-up camera set up and “super night” mode – an enticing ad, definitely. However, the ad seems to have gotten the phone maker in hot water with the Ogilvy group. The Ogilvy group has filed a suit before the Hon’ble Bombay High Court for copyright infringement claiming that Vivo has copied ideas pitched by Ogilvy to Vivo.

    As we await the verdict of the Court, let us see how Ogilvy might have protected itself.  The type of agreement it executed with Vivo for sharing information and data, especially when the information was being shared in a pitch meeting, is key to such protection.

    While it is common practice to enter into confidentiality and non-disclosure agreements at the pitch-level stage, focus has to be put on the type of information being classified as “confidential” and the manner in which the parties will be penalized if there is any breach of confidentiality. A well-considered confidentiality agreement shall provide for the following:

    • Define consideration: Consideration is the price you pay in return of goods purchased, or services availed from another person. In the absence of consideration, a contract in invalid. In a pitch meeting, the consideration for either party is the mere prospect of being professionally engaged by the other. No other amounts are usually paid. It is recommended that this consideration be specifically recorded in the contract. Although, this is something which appears evident, it is a good practice to spell this out.

     

    • Work for hire: The ideas pitched in a client meeting are not shared pursuant to any service arrangement between the parties. It is recommended that the confidentiality agreement should state that the ideas pitched are not “work for hire” even if the materials for the pitch have been customized to suit the client. For non-lawyers: if a work product is considered “work for hire,” then the party for whom such work is made is the owner of all copyright in such work, unless clearly stated otherwise.

     

    • Define Confidential Information: A typical definition of confidential information would include every bit of information shared in the course of the meeting. As such even small and inconsequential details shared will be subject to confidentiality. This may open the clause to challenge in the courts and can be avoided. A well-thought clause should be broad enough to include all sources of confidential information but stop at that. It should include any material being shared in which any intellectual property rights such as copyright subsists, including any marketing materials and information, business plans, templates of marketing plans and other details not already public. You may, additionally, indicate specific materials that should be designated as confidential.

     

    • Define the duration of confidentiality: the confidentiality obligation should survive even if the initial pitch meeting does not fructify into an engagement and continue to subsist as long as the confidential information remains confidential.

     

    • Limitation on Usage Rights: The agreement should provide that nothing in the agreement grants a license or right to the recipient to use the confidential information (including creating derivative works of the same) shared with it as part of the pitch.

     

    • Consequence of breach: An agreement which provides the right disincentives for breach, is more likely to be adhered to. The agreement should provide that any breach of the confidentiality and limited use obligation shall trigger indemnification rights of the party disclosing the information. The indemnification should include any indirect losses suffered and costs incurred (including attorney fees) by the disclosing party owing to such breach. The losses claimed in an Ogilvy-like situation may arguably be indirect in nature and a contractual provision of the sort discussed would help in such a scenario.

     

    The agreement so formed should adequately shield all parties to the agreement and ensure that any breach of the agreement is dealt with in a contained fashion. While the highlighted provisions may seem voluminous, they are in fact what help prevent the disputes that Ogilvy and Vivo has found itself party to.

     

    Authored by Darpan Singhi, Associate Ikigai Law with inputs from Anirudh Rastogi and Tanya Sadana.

    confidentiality, copyright infringinment, drafting contracts, NDAs, Ogilvy-vivo, pitches, startup mistakes

    Ikigai Law

    More posts by Ikigai Law

    Related Post

    • epaylater

      Ikigai Law (formerly TRA) represents fintech ePaylater in its fundraise

      By Ikigai Law | 0 comment

      Ikigai Law (formerly TRA) represents fin-tech startup ePaylater in its funding round. ePaylater was founded in December 2015 by Aurko Bhattacharya, Prasannaa Muralidharan, Uday Somayajula, Shanmuhanathan Thiagaraja and Saxena. The company gives customers the optionRead more

    • Ruchir-Arora_03

      Ikigai Law (formerly TRA) advised on UK’s Man Capital – CollegeDekho investment

      By Ikigai Law | 0 comment

      The Ikigai Law team (formerly TRA) advised on the UK based Man Capital – CollegeDekho investment deal. Man Capital is the global investment arm of Mansour Group. This deal marks the Mansour Group’s first investmentRead more

    • uav

      Comments on the guidelines issued by DGCA for the operation of UAVs / drones in India

      By Ikigai Law | 0 comment

      Comments on the DGCA’s Guidelines for Obtaining Unique Identification Number & Operation of Civil Unmanned Aircraft Systems The Directorate General of Civil Aviation (“DGCA”) had released guidelines for obtaining unique identification number (“UIN”) and operationRead more

    • r-JUSTICE

      Does the Law have a sense of humour?

      By Ikigai Law | 0 comment

      Managing Partner Anirudh Rastogi and Counsel Rishabh Sinha write in the Huffington Post on the liability of comics. “A ‘roast’ is a form of comedy that is both mean and good spirited, and most importantlyRead more

    • tra-logo-blog

      Ikigai Law (formerly TRA) organises the first National Contract Drafting Competition

      By Ikigai Law | 0 comment

      Announcing results of the first National Contract Drafting Competition organised by Ikigai Law (then TRA) and NLIU. First Prize: Ranjeev Khatana and Priyanka Murali National Law University Odisha, Cuttack Second Prize: George Kurian and AnuragRead more

    • toko

      TRA represented Toko Innovations Studio in its VC fund-raise

      By Ikigai Law | 0 comment

      TRA represented Toko Innovations Studio in its VC fund-raise from Indian Angel Network among other investors. Bangalore-based Toko Innovations Studios Pvt. Ltd, which runs a children’s entertainment portal called Imaginry, has raised Rs 3 croreRead more

    • girnar

      TRA represented GirnarSoft in its strategic investment into Advanced Structures India.

      By Ikigai Law | 0 comment

      TRA represented GirnarSoft in its strategic investment into Advanced Structures India. GirnarSoft will leverage ASI’s expertise in testing to improve car search experience on its portfolio of auto sites. Link

    • team_indus_blogimage

      Ikigai Law (formerly TRA) is proud to have worked with Team Indus on India’s first private space mission!

      By Ikigai Law | 0 comment

      For the first time ever, a private space venture in India has been contracted to carry a payload to the Moon for a global space agency. The venture, Bengaluru-based Team Indus, among the frontrunners inRead more

    Leave a Comment

    Cancel reply

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    NextPrevious

    Tags

    #DataProtection #Fintales bitcoin Blockchain Budget Consent Consultation Consultation Paper cryptocurrency data Data Controllers data governance Data localisation Data Protection Data Subjects digital economy Digital India Digital Lending Drones E-Commerce Facebook Fintech Government healthtech Ikigai Law India Indian government Innovation MeITY Notice Payments Personal Data policy Privacy RBI Recommendation Regulation Srikrishna Committee Stakeholders Startups Surveillance Technology Tech Policy TechTicker TRAI

    Connect with Ikigai Law

    Copyright 2018 Ikigai Law | All Rights Reserved             

    Information

    • Practice Areas
    • Blog
    • Careers
    • Contact Us
    • Privacy Policy

    Contact us

    Office
    2nd Floor, 44 Regal Building,
    Outer Circle, Connaught Place, New Delhi, Delhi - 110001

    Email Address

    contact@ikigailaw.com

    • About Us
      • About
      • Our Team
      • FinTales
      • Tech Ticker
    • Practice Areas
    • Blog
    • News & Events
      • Ikigai Law in the news
      • Ikigai Law at events
      • Ikigailaw on the social media
    • Careers
    Ikigai Law